![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:55:09PM -0500, jbk wrote: > I am interested in upgrading my home > server. It > seems from posts here people prefer > blowing away > their previous version and installing > annew ( > retaining backed up config files of course > ). I > would prefer to go the upgrade path, but > would > reconsider if there was recent evidence > that this > is not the way to go. > > let's here it I've had terrible luck upgrading both RH and Mandrake - it seems the surest way to turn a working system into a broken one. It should work better than it does... but, well, it doesn't for me :-(. My practice is to keep enough spare disk around to host a new install without hosing the old one. Dual-boot for awhile as I get all the customizations moved over to the new system (and, of course, keep my /home on its own partition so it's easy to share between both systems). Finally, when the new system looks 100%, I pull the plug on the old system. BTW, I recently tried and rejected Mandrake 9.0. It looked OK until I ran a Perl/Tk script of mine and saw it pin the CPU and cripple the system. Why a mature technology like Perl/Tk should suddenly go south is a mystery - possibly due to any number of changes in any number of dependent libraries - and it's one I don't have the time or inclination to solve on my own. Nathan Meyers nmeyers at javalinux.net
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |