Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
From: rek2 <rek2 at linuxbusca.com> Date: 13 Dec 2002 14:00:23 -0500 I understand. and you are right, but there is more chances of them doing it, and they have already show they are willing to change things for their own needs like the KDE/Gnome desktop look(not saying if is good or bad) but they did it at their own, a company needs to survive and make money. Which is absolutely their right under the GPL (and indeed, this kind of "freedom" is a big part of what free software is all about -- the right to make changes and redistribute them). "There are more chances of them doing it" is presuming them guilty; they have a right to be presumed not guilty unless proven otherwise. example. if RedHat goes bankrupt .... Debian will still be there :-) were RedHat may not, I don't know if they will be willing to give you or me the name RedHat for free so we can follow it and keep developing on it, I know Debian and others will always pass the flag to another guy if they can't support it anymore. is a community not a company they have different needs, etc. The name is irrelevant; even if Red Hat goes out of business, their successor can't prevent you from developing on it. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf at uunet.uu.net Project lead for Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |