Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:07:24AM -0500, Mark Glassberg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:18:51PM -0500, John Abreau wrote: > > Those are two entirely different modes of operation. When you telnet > > to port 25, the remote sendmail sees you as the direct end-user sending > > the message, whereas when your sendmail relays your message to the > > remote sendmail, the remote sendmail sees your sendmail as a middle-man. > > While such relaying is part of the basic design of sendmail, the fact > > remains that spammers have taken unscrupulous advantage of it for years, > > and as a result it's now considered bad practice to allow relaying in any > > but the most controlled and restricted fashion. > > > > The normal approach would be to ask your ISP to modify their server's > > setup to allow relaying from your address. I wouldn't expect much > > cooperation from them on this, though. > > Neither do I. Is there any way to get my sendmail mailer to imitate a > direct connection? If not, do you know of a linux mailer that can? If > not, do you know of a linux user mail program to replace mutt which > sends mail to an external server? Replace sendmail with nullmailer http://untroubled.org/nullmailer/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |