Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
KLAT2 at U Kentucky has an interesting Cluster made with AMD processors See aggregate.org/KLAT2/ > On Friday 10 January 2003 08:04 pm, Bill Horne wrote: > > > times). I think I'll build the 100Mb network (stage one) now while > > > acccumulating the 64 nodes (stage two) then focus on moving to Gigabit > > > (in stage three). I hope this makes sense as I'm still kinda new to this! > > > Any thoughts on who I might tap for gigabit donorships/sponsors? > > > > I read an article about someone that did a cluster using multiple 10/100 > > cards per machine, to save on the costs. Try a Google search. > > I once read an article on this, but I'll never find it. I think it was in > Linux Magazine. > > They put three network cards in each of around 80 machines, and the machines > were wired up to three different switches, and somehow the switches were also > connected together, and it meant that most machines could talk to each other > in one hop, and the rest could do it in two hops. If you lay it out so that > the SAN/NFS/cluster controller are accessible to all machines in one hop, > though, for most applications it should cover almost all your net traffic > needs. > > I could be misremembering, but I think they had the SAN on one switch and the > cluster controller on another switch (OpenPBS?) so that traffic was > independent, and the third switch was to the intranet outside the cluster for > issuing commands, etc. > > -- > DDDD David Kramer david at thekramers.net http://thekramers.net > DK KD > DKK D Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals. > DK KD > DDDD > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |