Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 14 Jan 2003 15:07:35 -0500 Cole Tuininga <colet at code-energy.com> wrote: > > I have a project that I'm working on that's going to require a fair > number of servers. For space considerations, we've been considering > going with a blade style setup. I have a couple questions for y'all > regarding them... (BTW, they will be intended to run Debian Linux) > > 1) Pros and Cons? Is there anything I need to know regarding blade > style servers in general? > > 2) Specific experiences? Anybody have brands they would recommend, or > recommend *against*? Why so many servers? Last meeting the IBM guys presented VMware ESX which can reduce the number of physical servers. There is certainly some pros regarding multiple physical servers, but they presented a pretty good argument toward using VMware such that you have multiple virtual servers. I would still go for multiple physical boxes for redundancy. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030114/9d8073e4/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |