Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Blade based systems



On 14 Jan 2003 15:07:35 -0500
Cole Tuininga <colet at code-energy.com> wrote:

> 
> I have a project that I'm working on that's going to require a fair
> number of servers.  For space considerations, we've been considering
> going with a blade style setup.  I have a couple questions for y'all
> regarding them...  (BTW, they will be intended to run Debian Linux)
> 
> 1) Pros and Cons?  Is there anything I need to know regarding blade
> style servers in general?
> 
> 2) Specific experiences?  Anybody have brands they would recommend, or
> recommend *against*?
Why so many servers?
Last meeting the IBM guys presented VMware ESX which can reduce the
number of physical servers. There is certainly some pros regarding
multiple physical servers, but they presented a pretty good argument
toward using VMware such that you have multiple virtual servers. I would
still go for multiple physical boxes for redundancy. 

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030114/9d8073e4/attachment.sig>



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org