Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:12:37 -0500 Derek Martin <blu at sophic.org> wrote: > That seems a bit harsh. It may violate the standards, but many > compilers allow it, and such a program will produce correct results. > Giving a grade of zero strikes me as extremely unjust, given that the > program will actually compile and work correctly with most compilers, > even if it is sloppy and bogus, particularly because I'm pretty sure I > have actually seen books on C use this construction... nearly all C compilers allow this construct because the standard does not require the compiler to flag it. In any case, I tell my class on day one about this. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030214/02370240/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |