Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:47:27 -0500 (EST) <taalebi at ai.mit.edu> wrote: > > > With many thanks to Peter, Jerry, and Dave for sharing their insights. > > At least in RedHat Linux 7.2, csh in not a symbolic link to tcsh. > tcsh is located in /usr/local/bin (/com/sol2/bin) > while > csh is in /bin. > > I have decided to use tcsh now and look into zsh later. > > And by the way, was is the advantage of using bash then? I personally run SuSE 8.1, but on the BLU server, Red Hat 7.1 it is a symlink. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030225/9bc49345/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |