Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 8 May 2003 12:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Chris Marget <chris at logsoft.com> wrote: > > any ideal for tape drive? > > my idea is that they're pretty expensive to buy, expensive to feed, > and painfully slow... > > i don't know if it will work for you, but the price and performance of > ide disks is hard to beat. removable ide drive carriers are kinda > clunky. i bought one of these instead: > > http://www.wiebetech.com/specsheets/pdf_dup_sdd.html > > now i can do my backups to my imac running os x. I gave up on tapes years ago. I back up to a hard drive. IMHO, removable harddrives are better than fixed hard drives. In the past: I've had the tape drive (commercial 9 track) brun a hole trhough a backup tape. I've had PC tape drives trash my backups. My strategy is that 2 hard drives are not going to crash simultaneously (which is not a 100% valid assumption). -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030509/1e069c4f/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |