![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 28 May 2003 23:06:25 -0400 "matt galster" <mattg at theworld.com> wrote: > SCO offers rebuttal: > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030528/law059_1.html > > Opened the June Linux Journal tonight, and what do I find but a review > of SCO linux 4?? WTF? This is very interesting. IMHO, this would let most Linux users off the hook, since a contract can only be enforced between those who are parties to the contract. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030529/57e5d375/attachment.sig>
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |