Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 18 Jun 2003 14:49:12 -0400 Seth Gordon <sethg at ropine.com> wrote: > I wonder if this is sufficient reason for IBM to win a motion to > dismiss the case for failure to state a claim, under rule 12(b)(6) of > the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Of course, SCO could file an > amended complaint specifying what parts of what files in the Linux > kernel source tree were allegedly infringing its IP, but that would > give the Linux community time to prepare a more specific defense > and/or reimplement the allegedly-infringing pieces of code. I'm sure they would have already filed it. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030618/62d5974c/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |