![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 10:45, Bob Keyes wrote: > I am at work at a biomedical research lab, and the video card on one of > the machines crapped out. This is a machine that is dual boot linux / > win98, a Dell Deminsion XPS B733 (733 mhz). The X windows has never been > configured adequately, I believe it is some wierd compatibility problem. > So I am looking for advice on a video card up to $100, that offers good > resolution, 2D reasonable performnce, but doesn't need to be a great 3D > card. It should have good accurate color though. It should be easy to get > running in its high performance under redhat9 and work well with win98 as > well (though I may try to get them to switch the windows side to win2k, as > they have a spare license for it..win2k has always seemed like the least > horrible MS-Windows product). You'll probably be fine with the "value" video cards if you don't care about the 3D stuff. On the Nvidia side, the GeForce2 MX should only cost you ~$40. The newest "value" card is the GeForce 4MX and that is ~$60. Remember that the MX = "value" for Nvidia. So, a GeForce 3TI > GeForce 4MX for 3D (thanks to some marketing puke at Nvidia). The only problems that I've had with Nvidia cards on Linux (GeForce2, 2MX, 4MX, 3 Ti) was bad performance with Gnome w/Metacity on some of post-3123 drivers. The newest driver doesn't have that problem though. Steve
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |