Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> I personally take their recent actions as a realization that they'll > never be profitable again selling services or products, and this is > their last chance. Their most recent quarterly results are summarized in this press release: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030528/law053_1.html Unfortunately, the company appears to be making money, even though it's kinda small (gross sales $65M/year). Investors value their stock at over $10/share, and it's gone up a lot this year (possibly because some folks think they'll win their legal cases, possibly because some folks think the company will continue to sell products). These jerks need to be sent a message by anyone involved in purchasing for corporations or governments or educational institutions anywhere that SCO's products have no future customer base. Plenty of other options are out there. And, of course, SCO will ultimately lose: freeware coders will spend a couple weeks rewriting whatever code (if any) is found infringing on Unix copyrights, and that'll be the end of it. SCO's legal underpinnings are far weaker than those of the RIAA (which as much as we might despise them, the RIAA does at least have legally enforceable contracts with content producers whose work cannot be coded around in a few workdays). -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |