Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 15 Aug 2003, Seth Gordon wrote: > Has anyone written an essay that explains, in a level-headed tone rather > than in a slashdot-like polemic, how the *design* of Windows, Office, > Outlook, etc. make them hard to secure? I have my suspicions, but I'm > not familiar enough with Windows programming to be sure. It's a good question. Education is always a good thing. Unfortunately you have to wonder whether people care to be enlightened. If you just got whacked with a virus at home, and I either said to you "Here's a program you can run so you don't get viruses anymore" or I said "Let me explain to you why viruses happen...." I think that your typical home user wants the first one. Immediate gratification. "If I buy this Linux thing then I won't get viruses anymore, right? Here's my credit card." > Well, you could write your essay at your leisure and just keep > sharpening up your language until the next Windows worm hits the front > pages. How much longer could it take? :) I belong to some other non-techie groups (writers groups, etc...) and every time they mention "email viruses" I point out that this usually means Outlook, and one cheap and easy way to avoid Outlook viruses is to not run Outlook. Sometimes I get a nibble and people come back around saying "What other email programs could I run?" So it works, in theory. I figure it can work on a bigger scale -- "If you're frustrated enough with Windows viruses, one solution is to get off Windows." For many users who only use the PC for net browsing and email, they might be tempted to give Linux a try. Especially if I can point them to their local Linux User's Group for help, and recommend a distribution that focuses on ease of setup. I think part of the key is not telling people "You *should* run Linux", but rather "You *could* run Linux." The former implies that they've already made a mistake and puts them on the defensive. The latter just implies that they have options. Duane
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |