Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

HTML to Text only emails...



sounds like a valid strategy. Stripping attachments
is the best thing you can do. A nice tool to do
that and more (e.g. mangle html)

http://mailtools.anomy.net/sanitizer.html


On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 11:50, Wizard wrote:
> A company that I do work for, in an effort to protect itself from it's own
> lusers, is considering parsing emails so that any external HREFs inside the
> email point to http://localhost. They are also going to parse out all
> attachments to a central intranet location, where they will be reviewed by
> admins for legitimacy before being forwarded to the addressee. Can anyone
> see any problems with this strategy? (It sounds valid to me, but I wanted to
> make sure I hadn't missed anything before responding)
> Thanks,
> Grant M.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- 
SANS - Internet Storm Center
http://isc.sans.org
PGP Key: http://isc.sans.org/jullrich.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030817/62418d77/attachment.sig>



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org