| Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
One issue here is, who gets to define these terms? The technical
definitions of these various forms of attack comes to us by way of
those who created them, but the meanings become interpreted over time
throught the use and misuse of them by the general public. Words mean
what you use them to mean. Whose definition is authoritative?
FWIW, here are the definitions as I have come to know them:
Virus: any program capable of replicating itself in some manner.
Worm: any program which automatically seeks to gain entrance to remote
systems, and which when it succeeds, starts a new instance of
itself on the new host
Trojan: any program which secretly does something other than what it
purports to do
Backdoor: any program used to provide a non-conventional means of
remotely accessing a system
Bot: any program which automatically intercepts events and acts on
them on behalf of its user
So then, a worm is a specific kind of virus, because it
self-replicates. Many of the other definitions of these terms I've
seen place arbitrary restrictions on them, such as "it propogates by
e-mail" or "it contains X form of malware" -- in general, these
additional restrictions are artificial, deriving from more common
examples of such malware, and from more common usages in modern
language. These classifications are intented to be a bit more general
than that.
It is also worth noting that it is possible to have examples of all of
these which are not malicious in intent, though you may have to use
your imagination to come up with useful examples... I leave that as
an exercise for the reader. :)
--
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.
Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail.
Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030820/454137b9/attachment.sig>