Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:55:04AM -0400, J. Hunter Heinlen wrote: > > None of the specifics you give here conflict with the general definition > > I gave above. In fact your first line is a simple re-statement of > > exactly what I said. Your merely describe more of what "might" be done by a > > trojan or how a trojan might be created. Backdoors are another function > > frequently generated by worms/virii. > > Your definition implied that a trojan horse must also be a virus or worm. > I do not believe that is correct. You're right. My bad - I did not mean to imply that a trojan has to be either a worm or a virus. I was guilty of letting the previous train of discussion (worms and virii) drive my thinking. Just the kind of thing I was warning others not to do! :-) (Mine behind hast been bit by mine own verbiage! oucheth... :-) ) > Both viruses and worms try to propagate > themselves, trojans do not have to. I also do not believe that they require > an attempt at escalating privileged, as others have claimed, or that > they necessarily are trying to trick privileged users. > > > When/if that happens, malware producers will return to > > using the more subtle methods pioneered for attacks on UNIX-Like systems, > > I do not think malware developers that can use such techniques ever stopped. > Those that can (not) or will not learn (or, at least, haven't yet) to use such > techniques develop email and macro malware. And each step down the IQ > food chain in an order of magnitude larger.... Yes.. too true. I guess the question then is how soon (if ever) will Outlook style vulnerabilities become so few that scripts are published to attack in more sophisticated fashions? If I may: Derek's Law "As long as Outlook is used on the internet, We will all be adversely affected by virii." Can anyone re-write this in a more elegant, less awkward way? (please!) (If it's not Derek's Law It was at least inspired by his comments so he should get credit for it) -- Jeff Kinz, Open-PC, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA. jkinz at kinz.org copyright 2003. Use is restricted. Any use is an acceptance of the offer at http://www.kinz.org/policy.html. Don't forget to change your password often.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |