Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 23:41, Rich Braun wrote: > > Why RAID? Well, it's a real time-consuming pain in the butt to reinstall a > system from backup. And most of us are kinda lazy about backups. Disc drives > are 100 times more reliable than they were 10 years ago--but do you want to > trust everything to a drive, especially if you can have a continuous automatic > backup with a mere 60 minutes or so of advance prep? It seems that every time I read an introduction to RAID, the author puts in some disclaimer to warn that RAID should not be a *substitute* for making regular backups. Of course, since I have neither, I shouldn't pick nits.... -- "[Y]ou're reading stuff on the Net, so you accept that you'll run across some people who use bad words and/or forgot to take their medication." --Robert Munro, regarding Slashdot :: seth gordon :: sethg at ropine.com :: blog http://dynamic.ropine.com/yo/ :: homepage http://ropine.com/ :: resume http://ropine.com/sethg/cv.html
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |