Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Bill Horne <bill at horne.net> asked: > Has anyone else been getting these? Anyone know why? My messages post OK to > the list, but I get this response. A BLU list subscriber apparently is using a proxy re-mailer to block all incoming mail that is not on a white-list. We're probably going to see this more and more. Spammers are bringing on these really annoying countermeasures. Hopefully whoever subscribed to iPermitMail's spam-blocking service will recognize themselves and either add "To: discuss at blu.org" to the whitelist, or discontinue the service and use another which is more mailing-list friendly. For the rest of you considering challenge-response white list services, I suggest (a) not using them at all, I find them highly annoying when I'm trying to send email to someone, or (b) if you do use them, bear in mind what they do to mailing-list postings. Before enabling a new spam filter of any kind, test the heck out of its behavior when it comes to mailing lists. It violates RFCs and common-sense rules of conduct to send error messages to the "From" address in a message-board posting, the software should send those to the Errors-To field. <--soapbox mode--> A whole lot of spam-filtering software out there has been slapped together in a hurry the past few months, in response to the crushing tidal wave of spam which arrived in 2003. Unfortunately that tidal wave seems to be growing about 20% a month, if my own in-box is any indication. Slapped-together software has a lot of unintended side effects (in this case, they often contribute even more to the cesspool of annoyance email polluting the 'net). <--doesn't that feel better?--> -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |