Windows to Power ATM's in 2005

[kylep at g4.net (Kyle Plummer)]

I've been away from Fleet for almost three years.  It's difficult to say why
the ATM manufacturers choose to go with M$.  The only thing that changes
from bank to bank is the graphics on the screen.  Everything else is
standardized (hardware, communications, etc.).  They use very low to mid
range CPU's due to the needs of the machine, not the banks.

I don't doubt the banks central data centers have/had fun filtering virus's
in email.  Especially now that many have switched to M$ 2000 from Novell
servers.  But, I agree a Unix solution would have been more cost effective
than the licensing co$t from M$.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Timothy M. Lyons" <lyons at digitalvoodoo.org>
To: "Kyle Plummer" <kyle at breezy.com>
Cc: "BLU Discussion List" <discuss at blu.org>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Windows to Power ATM's in 2005


> As a former OS/2 user, I agree that it's time has come/gone. However one
would
> think that given the legacy of big iron in those shops, a unixish
> solution would have prevailed.
>
> As to hacking ATM's being a moot point, all I can say is with patience,
> dedication, motivation, and resources, _any_ network or device can be
hacked.
> It's just a matter of finding the chink in the armor.
>
> --Tim
>