Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
and don't forget people, fedora is a OPEN SOURCE COMMUNITY PROJECT, if you want to work on a distro, work on that... building a distro is alot of work. -miah On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:40:20PM -0500, Grant Young wrote: > And now for the curmudgeonly view: > > Ugh... Another distribution??? > > While I'm disappointed with Red Hat's decision to pull out of the > low-end distribution market I'd have to say that the effort to make it > work they put in was way out of whack with the return they saw. The > main reason to use Red Hat was to have the brand name and possibility of > paid support behind it. > > Trying to roll yet another distribution won't bring back the brand name > support that gives comfort to the PHBs giving the go ahead for Linux. > If they're willing to shell out just buy the Red Hat offering. The cost > is still relatively insignificant to their bottom line. If they won't > or can't afford it just pick some other existing distribution like Suse > or Debian or Gentoo that fulfills your philosophical bent and technical > needs. The maintainers of the those distros will appreciate the > support. This is my personal view. One of the great things I love > about Linux and Open Source is the freedom to do stuff like rolling your > own distribution. It's just not my cup of tea. > > I haven't personally used the Linux-Athena distribution but I did have > experience trying to use the earlier Athena versions with non-Athenized > applications (like Oracle) and it was pretty much a disaster. Project > Athena solves the workstation application and file server maintenance > problem for MIT very, very well and their programmers do an amazing job > keeping things up to date. The thing that makes Athena work well is its > elegantly engineered rigidity. But in my experience the tweaks and > improvements they put in for their environment usually mess up services > and interfaces expected by many applications. YMMV. > > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 11:47, Derek Atkins wrote: > > "Anand Rao" <andy at honnu.com> writes: > > > > > I am in for it. I feel this will is a great great Idea Ready to help this > > > project. > > > > For what it's worth, you may want to look at what MIT is doing with > > "Linux-Athena". It (currently) a Red Hat based distribution with an > > automatic (push/pull) update system which allows centralized control > > of lots of workstations with similar configuration. > > > > -derek > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |