Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 16:04, Chris Devers wrote: > <facetious> > > Would anyone feel badly -- or notice! -- if we just, like, got rid of > Utah? Wouldn't that take care of the issue? > > As they say, "nuke the site from orbit -- it's the only way to be sure." > > It's really an elegant solution if you think about it... > > </facetious> Yes, but it's just not personal enough. I'm really not sure that watching Utah go up in a mushroom cloud will satiate my violent fanticies about the ultimate demise of SCO. Dave -- David J. C. Beach <beach at verinet.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031120/7f76b26c/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |