Redhat Enterprise WS, ES & AS

[jullrich at sans.org (Johannes B. Ullrich)]

I am using RedHat AS 2.1 and recently installed ES V.3.
AS includes a lot of the failover stuff from the Linux HA
project. Also, the AS kernel includes patches for NUMA
and such.

I had not too much time to play with ES V.3. But it looks
like it includes similar features, but is probably missing
the HA software.

Overall: Feature wise, ES or AS is not all that exciting. 
Nothing you can't do on your own. The main reason to get
AS or ES is the ability to use RHN/up2date to keep your
systems patched. So depending on your skill, doing a solid
initial build and tools like 'autorpm' may give you the 
same functionality.



On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:27, Dave Peters wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Looking for information about Redhat Enterprise WS, ES
> and AS.
> Is anyone install and using WS, ES and AS? Can anyone
> tell me what's the different? Is it possible to buy WS
> and work as AS?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> DP
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> http://companion.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- 
CTO SANS Internet Storm Center               http://isc.sans.org
phone: (617) 786 1563            
  fax: (617) 786 1550                          jullrich at sans.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031202/69bce479/attachment.sig>