Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I am using RedHat AS 2.1 and recently installed ES V.3. AS includes a lot of the failover stuff from the Linux HA project. Also, the AS kernel includes patches for NUMA and such. I had not too much time to play with ES V.3. But it looks like it includes similar features, but is probably missing the HA software. Overall: Feature wise, ES or AS is not all that exciting. Nothing you can't do on your own. The main reason to get AS or ES is the ability to use RHN/up2date to keep your systems patched. So depending on your skill, doing a solid initial build and tools like 'autorpm' may give you the same functionality. On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:27, Dave Peters wrote: > Hi all, > > Looking for information about Redhat Enterprise WS, ES > and AS. > Is anyone install and using WS, ES and AS? Can anyone > tell me what's the different? Is it possible to buy WS > and work as AS? > > Thanks > > DP > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > http://companion.yahoo.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- CTO SANS Internet Storm Center http://isc.sans.org phone: (617) 786 1563 fax: (617) 786 1550 jullrich at sans.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031202/69bce479/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |