Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
At first you may think this is off-topic, but I think it is extremely germain to any discussion of Linux, and as a free software advocate and web developer, I've tussled with these issues for a long time (without finding many absolute answers). I'm trying to come up with a 'good' employment agreement or corporate IP policy that covers 'itellectual property' (apologies to RMS. I know that term is overly vague and encompasses at least three separate areas of law and history, but...). When I say 'good', I mean I would like to create an employment agreement / company policy that is balanced, versus the standard 'if you think of it while employed by ACME, then ACME owns it' approach. The other thing I'm trying to achieve is to cover the issues of copyright, and patent rights in an environment where GNU software is used. From a practical perspective, I am a web developer who writes PHP scripts and tools on my own time, possibly releasing those scripts as GPL projects. I also use GPL projects and other OpenSource code from MySQL to Apache, PERL etc. How should a company that supports the concepts of free software create an employment agreement that respects the contributions of the employee and also implements a 'defensive copyright and/or patent' strategy? I bring all my accumulated experience, and knowledge of GPL software, and my personal projects to work, and build on those ideas in my professional capacity. Most employment agreements I've signed in the past basically ask that you list all the things you've ever done that are not subject to assignment to the company. Then they say something to the effect that anything you do, think, or reduce to practice is the property of the company. It seems to me to be an exercise of complete nonsense to claim any rights in software, since my ideas are just added to the ideas of others, but given that the US legal system does not share my attitudes toward software patents and copyright, does anyone know of a good example of copyright, patent, trademark, employment and/or non-compete agreements specifically in the field of web development? Does a system comprised of PHP scripts constitute 'software'? I found a fairly good example from the Embedded Linux Consortium. (the second half of their bylaws) at http://www.embedded-linux.org/files/ELCByLawsPlusIPRA.pdf, but I'm looking for more feedback from the community. I am frustrated not to find more information about how companies can best implement the GPL in their IP policies at gnu.org, or the many free software advocate sites. Thanks, Greg -- Greg Rundlett Chief Technology Officer Knowledge Institute creators of the Business Utility Zone Gateway at www.buzgate.org (603) 642-4720 greg at buzgate.org It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them. -- Alfred Adler
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |