![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:28:48PM -0500, Johannes B. Ullrich wrote: > I guess its more a case of clue-less AV admins. These notifications are > essentially pointless, and in some cases worse then then virus > (I got flooded with them back when Sobig-f came out) > While I think that might be partially true (rejecting mail for an offending attachment is dumb), I don't think sending a notification is dumb at all. On a number of occasions my e-mail has been blocked because the message was PGP-signed, and the signature was considered an unknown and/or malicious attachment type. Had I not received notification of this from the mail system, I would have lost out on several job interview opportunities, because neither I nor the intended recipient would have known I'd sent that mail. Receiving false virus reports and such from forged headers is unfortunate, but to call sending them at all "clue-less" is at least a bit short-sighted. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040129/cbf25922/attachment.sig>
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |