Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I'd also suggest using "cvs update -C" instead of "rm; cvs update" to pull down new versions of the files. I don't know if there is any better way than looking at the output of cvs. I don't know if there is a usable return value. -derek Duane Morin <dmorin at lear.morinfamily.com> writes: > I have a script that currently starts by deleting 2 files in a given > directory, then doing a cvs update on those files to get the freshest > copy. Those files are critical to proper running of my script. > > The thing is there's no brain to determine that during that update it's > really getting the most recent version of the files (which are being > checked in by a different job). So it could be deleted the old ones and > bringing them back again and never know it. We can assume that the two > files are always updated as a set, there will never be a case when one is > updated and the other is not. > > I'd like to change the script to say "If the version in CVS is new for > these files, then get the new version and continue, otherwise exit." > > One way is is to use "cvs -n update file1 file2" which will display > something like this: > > U file1 > P file2 > > meaning that file1 has been updated, and file2 has been "patched" (a > variation on update). I could grep the output for lines that start with U > or P and if there's more than 0, then I have new files, so go ahead and > issue a real update command. Of course I'd have to do this while the > current local copies still exist, otherwise they would always be updated. > > Is there a better one? I was hoping that maybe I could use a return value >>From CVS, maybe it returns a 0 if there's nothing to update or something, > but no such luck. I wish that "cvs status" had more usefulness but it's > output is so big and fat that it's hard to scrape out the one little bit I > need. > > Duane > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |