![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:31:01PM -0500, Johannes B. Ullrich wrote: > > > ISP -- connection to internet. > > are all 6 people in one location (one office)? If so, look at > some of the business DSL lines. > > > Email > > Storage for offsite backup. 40 gigs would last a long time. > > Maybe space for a web site. > > If you are on a bare-bones budget: I have had so far good experience > with Valueweb.com dedicated server ($60/Month... 60 GByte disk...). > The machines are very basic (Athlon Duron CPUs and the like), but > will probably work well for you. Speaking of bare-bone budgets, there are some darn cheap UMLs out there that you could use for such services. http://www.redwoodvirtual.com They are like a colo server in the sense that you get root access. > However, this will require that you administer the machine yourself. > I would recommend a dedicated machine vs. a shared system just due > to security (in particular given the Valueweb pricing). > > > Ideally, I'm looking for all this in one package -- an ISP who will > > lease us a relatively small machine, at his site, with eg a 40 G > > drive, who will provide and administer a few email accounts. > > Locally, we'd use a web-based or POP interface (Outlook Express? <gag cough>) > > Another option: With most business DSL lines, you get some basic > e-mail and web space (however, usually much less then 40 GByte). > > > I understand the ISP provider and the other services can be separated > > but the fewer people to deal with, the better so my first choice is to combine them. > > > > My goal is to not have to concern myself with this stuff -- > > that the ISP or co-lo provider manages the system. I'll have plenty > > else to do. > > sound attitude. Talk to your linux people ans see if they feel > up to managing a server. One caveat: Don't have them talk you into > hosting Web/E-mail in house. Bandwidth is expensive if you buy it > "retail". Colocation bandwidth is much cheaper, usually easily making up > for the hardware cost and 'rent'. In additions, while it may > cost you, its easier to call up a Colo facility at 2 am in the moring > to reboot/fix a server vs. having to drive into the office. > > (expensive: $250 for a decent SDSL line, $1,000 for a T1 with > local loop charge...)
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |