![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> > >>>certainly possible to exchange materials which do not have copyrights > >>>to which you are not the owner via these file sharing networks; > >>>however I don't think anyone here is naive enough to believe that is > >>>(exclusively) what you intend... > >>> OK I got confused with who said what and the quotes are so deep now I felt it was better to strip the headers rather than misquote somebody. So don't sue me ;) I believe (IANAL) that there was a change in copyright law a little while ago, wherein that anything copyright (even not a registered copyright), the author maintains exclusinve distribution rights by default. They can give this right up via a license, or give up all rights by releasing the work to the public domain. Of course, there is still the doctrine of fair use. Personally, I believe that the law has swung way to much to the favor of the copyright holder. But we are straying very from from the topic of this list. Let's just say that there is much legal abuse of intellectual property rights by IP holders, and much law-breaking on p2p networks. However these is much abuse on other networks as well, so it doesn't seem that calling p2p use likely criminal activity is fair. I caution ISPs not to use blanket filters against p2p and other services when selling an 'Internet Connection'. In my opinion, an internet connection has no ports filtered by the ISP, and has no restrictions on the application layer protocols. The content delivered may be restricted due to legal reasons. Filtering may happen at the customer's request, or there may be a special type of 'restricted' internet connection sold. But all such restrictive connections have to be explicitly labeled, and the customer should understand this, at the time they sign up. If I were in a DSL contract and my ISP suddenly decided to filter outbound port 25, or block access to Kazaa servers, I would be outraged and would consider this a breach of contract. I would find a new ISP, and if they told me I couldn't leave the contract I'd wait for it to be settled in court.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |