Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 03:39:28PM -0400, Cole Tuininga wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 15:21, dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote: > > Have you evaluated mon? > > Nope - do you use it? If so, what do you like about it? I've used two dozen systems; mon is the one I keep returning to. It may be masochism. The good news: mon works pretty well as a primarily SNMP-based requestor of values, which then evaluates certain conditions and takes certain actions. In practice, this comes down to: mon: ping productionhost (OK, it's up and on the network) mon: run ssh.mon productionhost (OK, I can ssh to it) mon: snmp get diskspace / productionhost (OK, it hasn't run out of space on /) mon: snmp get process named oracle productionhost (OK, oracle is running) mon: run simple-oracle-query productionhost (blast, that failed) (if it fails again within 1 minute, send pages to...) If that's the level of functionality you want, this is a good bet. You can add in web integration of various sorts, but basically, when mon isn't sending alerts, everything should be good. -dsr-
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |