Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Derek Atkins <warlord at MIT.EDU> wrote: > Uh, actually, there is a penalty. With S/W RAID1 the kernel has to > perform two writes across the PCI/IDE bus ...This extra writing will > definitely cause a peformance penalty (on writes) for software raid > that you wont see in a hardware raid. It's not measurable because the drive speed is well under 1/2 the PCI bus speed (more like 1/200th). > Also, historically it had NOT been recommended to use both parts of an > IDE bus because the master/slave relationship reduces the bus > throughput. Has this changed recently? I'm not talking master/slave. I'm talking RAID1 on a two-drive configuration: one drive as master on each of the two independent IDE buses. It's been something like 10 years since any motherboard came out that didn't have independent IDE buses. Try a benchmark on a 2-drive software RAID1 vs. a 2-drive hardware RAID1. You won't be able to measure the difference. I tried and couldn't find any. -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |