Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 21:14:06 -0400 David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> wrote: > http://slashdot.org/articles/04/06/05/1250244.shtml?tid=126&tid=137&tid=172&tid=193 Unless I see something radically different in the low end router market, I continue to recommend the Linksys units based on my experience both in wired and wireless. The G technology is relatively new, but in both cases, the flaw was in remote access, which is a biggie. However, my experience with Netgear products and customer service has been very positive. I had damaged by PC card and dongle cord, and not only was I able to speak to an English speaking human and was able to close the transaction quickly to my satisfaction. BTW: I started with a Linksys BEFSR41 that ran flawlessly 24x7. I then obtained a wireless BEFW11S4 that has run with zero problems 24x7 for the past couple of years. I usually leave the wireless disabled when I am not using it. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040606/84e1e516/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |