Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 10:30:07AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > > wrong. I've used this for years and never had a problem with a > > mis-assigned IP address (except when an engineer swapped out a NIC and > > didn't tell anyone)... > > In my configuration said engineer wouldn't get an IP Address at > all.. :) (I have DHCPD configured to ONLY give out pre-assigned IPs). > I consider this a feature. Oh, they got an address, but it was excluded from DNS and NIS, and IIRC had other access controls at the router/switch level, so they could basically only access the internet. They complained rather loudly. (Even without access limitations at the network level, if the system wasn't in DNS/NIS, lots of stuff broke for them. For example, NFS mount requests would be refused...) -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040708/0cfa158d/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |