![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hi everyone, Normally, I wouldn't ask for help with work-related problems, but I'm out of ideas. If anyone can provide a reasonable answer to this, I'm bringing a stack of free pizzas to the next BLU meeting. One of my clients claims that I have a memory leak in one of our applications. He claims that 'top' reports my app is slowly consuming more memory after running for 30 days (now 20 megs, up from 8 when it was first started). Perhaps there is a memory leak, but I don't think 'top' is a good indicator of one ('free' would be much better). In addition, I've searched high and low for the leak with no success. I've also run Valgrind (http://valgrind.kde.org) on my app, with no report of a leak. My question is, does anyone have any creative ideas to prove that a leak does NOT exist? It's far easier to prove that one does exist than to prove it does not. Knowing that the memory will likely be released after some time, I need to prove this but it will take months for the app to run in order to so. I would like to limit the amount of memory the app is allowed to consume. I've tried using 'ulimit,' but the app repeatedly goes over the limit (soft and hard). Using '/etc/security' may work, but I'm reluctant to try for it's on a per-user basis, and I would like a per-process basis. Any ideas? What's YOUR favorite means of detecting memory leaks? Lastly, what kind of pizza/soda do you like? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys, see you at the next meeting. -sam
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |