Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
miah wrote, On 08/06/2004 07:33 PM: > Personally, if I had an array of systems that needed the same data on > each disk, and I couldn't use something like NFS, I'd be setting up > rsync. When I worked at turbolinux, we were using rsync to syncronize > the passwd and shadow files among the servers, it was a cool hack that > didnt require NIS. There will be a lag in things being sync'd, but > atleast the user wouldn't have to sftp the file to each server. If > the user did have to sftp, there would probably be even more lag due > to the probably of them transfering to one server at a time and having > to type in their password. Glad I read your post before replying; I was going to mention rsync. If you need to synchronize bidirectionally, consider unison. -- DDDD David Kramer david at thekramers.net http://thekramers.net DK KD DKK D If all of the economists and all of the meteorologists in the world DK KD changed jobs....no one would notice DDDD
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |