Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
scp is only really slow when you have compression turned on, or you're dealing with ancient hardware. -miah On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 07:27:19PM -0400, Jules Gilbert wrote: > First, are you sure you don't have the network running at 10M, and not 100. > > Second, scp IS SLOW! I don't know how fast your machines are, but this > could be the problem. Send one msg in the clear (use FTP.) Is it much > faster? If not, you've eliminated encryption/decryption problems as the > culprit. > > If I had to guess, with slow hardware, I would say that your scp task's are > slowing things down. What do others have to say? > > > --jg > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <heidi at midnighthax.com> > To: <discuss at blu.org> > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 6:50 PM > Subject: Diagnosing a slow network > > > > I'm trying to work out why copying a file across my network is so slow. > > There are four Linux boxes connected to a 100Mb switch, and copying a > 300Mb > > from one system to another runs at 500K/second. The systems aren't busy, > so > > it could be a network card problem, a hard disk being slow, or - what? I'm > > using scp to do the copy, so there will be some overhead with encryption, > > but 500K/sec is way too slow. Any ideas on how to troubleshoot this? > > > > H > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss at blu.org > > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |