Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Aug 30, 2004, at 8:56 AM, dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:48:08AM -0400, Josh Pollak wrote: >> Thanks, I'll use this. I would still like to know what's up with my >> clock though. This much drift is not normal. > > It certainly is. > > The RTC in your machine is probably rated at 100 parts per > million maximum failure. Multiply by 86,400 seconds per day, 100 ticks > per second, and you get an assumed clock drift of 8.64 seconds > per day. > > Anything better than that is simply your RTC doing better than > specified. Thats over a full minute of drift in one week. I find that hard to believe. Perhaps the RTC is inaccurate as a trade off for providing so many ticks per second, but I've never seen a computer's clock drift this quickly, even when we weren't running NTP.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |