Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:59:49 -0400 Robert La Ferla <robertlaferla at comcast.net> wrote: > Brian Nelson <nelson at bignachos.com> wrote: > > > I fail to see how digests have any value these days, but what's > > wrong > > > >with using formail to split the messages? > > > > > I suppose if you are using one mail user agent and set it to sort > incoming mail into separate folders, you don't need digests. However, > I find myself needing to read e-mail on the road where I may not have > a choice of MUA or operating system and digests work better for that > situation. Is "formail" installed on the server or on the client? Definitely client side. Note that you can set up digests as either plain or MIME. The MIME digests are effectively split by your email program. Just a comment on Brian's comment. There are still people who use dialup. I know one guy who lives in an RV and uses a cell modem. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040905/ca8df348/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |