Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:37:06PM -0400, Mark J. Dulcey wrote: > Eric wrote: > >markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > >| Domino is "more or less" a database, and as such, you should make sure > >| that the distribution you use supports IBM's jfs, or default to ext2. > >ext3 > >| is horrible for database work. > > > >Why is ext3 horrible for database work? My experience with databases > >are minimal and I'm just curious. Thanks. > > Linux Gazette did some benchmarking of Linux file systems > (http://linuxgazette.net/102/piszcz.html). Their tests concluded that > ext3 is the slowest overall of the journaling file systems, and > particularly bad at handling large files, which will happen a lot when > you're using it to store a database. They forgot, however, how infrequently a real database will create or delete a large file.... essentially never. If you are using the filesystem *as* a database, there are better choices. But for storing an Oracle, MySQL or PostgreSQL db, the filesystems all handle about the same... and ext3 comes out ahead for stability. -dsr- --
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |