Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Doug Sweetser wrote, On 10/13/2004 07:20 AM: > Hello: > > Another important factor in the long term success of Unix is the > ineroperability of tools. Although I use mh primarily, I can also use > exmh, sylpheed, and squirrelmail (I regularly use the last two). The > underlying data structure is the same, individual files. > > As I only barely understand it, the mbox format was developed by > sys admins who didn't want so many small files around for each > user. Do evolution, thunderbird, and kmail give you a choice about > how mail gets stored: individual files, mbox, or uniq format? I know > that sylpheed will allow either individual files or mbox, which is the > best answer. Keep in mind that if you're using IMAP, it's out of the hands of the MUA, and they are on the server in whatever format the IMAP server uses. mbox format is often used because most filesystems do better at fewer larger files than they do many smaller files. And with almost any filesystem, it will take up less disk space, and fewer inodes. That being said, the next time I have lots of free time (read: the next time I'm unemployed), I want to switch from uw-imap to another IMAP server that uses individual files, because I tend to do things like grep for messages a lot. And I've hated uw-imap for a long time now. -- DDDD David Kramer david at thekramers.net http://thekramers.net DK KD DKK D The avalanche has already begun. DK KD It is too late for the pebbles to vote. DDDD - Kosh, babylon 5
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |