Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 10:38:54AM -0400, Gordon Marx wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:30:28 +0900, Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > > I think it would take the average web administrator 10 minutes to set > > up a location on the web server to dump the documents into, password > > protect it, and teach the secretary how to access it. Setting up a > > more robust, general-purpose solution can, I think, be done in under a > > day. There are probably even existing solutions that can be set up > > quickly and easily... > > To say nothing of the fact that having the sec'y point everyone at a > central location makes it _MUCH_ easier to ensure versioning, backup, > etc. etc. Indeed. Oh, I neglected to mention that I have worked at a company which did a lot of document distribution (similarly to) this way. No one ever seemed to have a problem with it (except when it stopped working)... The differences were that a) it was used only for in-house distribution, though there was no reason in principle it couldn't have been used for external document publication as well, and b) our users didn't use a web interface (though they could have -- one was provided) but instead used a proprietary client. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20041014/ae00e3e7/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |