Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:02:01 +0000 dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote: > Bad ASN.1 parsers have been responsible for zillions of security > holes in the last few years. This might be true. I wrote my own ASN.1 parser about 10 years ago. Essentially, ASN.1 is a way to encode binary data in a standard way. If you are going to do your own application, then using a home-grown protocol is probably much better. ASN.1 is a much more general protocol. It was used by SNMP, which is where I was introducted to it. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20041017/aadac895/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |