Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:48:20AM -0400, trlists at clayst.com wrote: > On 20 Oct 2004 dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote: > > > Nameservers always try 53 UDP first, because most requests and > > responses will fit into a single packet. > > That implies that sometimes they don't, which makes me wonder if a > nameserver which only accepts UDP on port 53 is fully functional. Is > it? Guess I should read some more details on DNS. If the nameserver has no authoritative records that would exceed one packet, then yes, it's fully functional. The other use for TCP 53 is AXFR mass transfer of records, but this is a) optional and b) should be protected from access by any other than designated nameservers. -dsr-
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |