![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> You're missing the point. When I go through a toll > booth with the transponder, the govermnent knows > where I am. They can also keep records (which they > do) and can use them to build a profile of my travel > habits if they choose to. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. For the purposes of ensuring payment for the tolls, it is of course possible to make these records short term. For example, if paid by credit card then holding the records ninety (90) days is sufficient in that one cannot dispute a charge after ninety days. Hence the records could be destroyed at the end of ninety days without endangering in any way that the State got its money. [ This would be much like the corporate settings where email is deleted at the ninety-day mark as a precaution against unwanted discovery motions in future court cases. ] However, the New Jersey Legislature required EZ Pass to keep such records for ten years as a condition of licensure. This was passed explicitly as an aid to law enforcement. Since EZ Pass is one and the same as FastLane, and since having a uniform procedure back at Data Central is cheaper than jurisdiction-specific procedures, one must assume that toll records are kept for ten years regardless of the location of the toll collection point. As we have not yet had EZ Pass in operation for a decade, it seems conservative to assume that until records are destroyed at the ten year mark that the effective retention period is in fact "indefinite." If one wanted a more direct freedom v. safety example I cannot think what it would be, and for extra measure money is involved. If I had a radio talk show I'd have some fun with this... --dan
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |