Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Bob Gorman writes: | TV Meets IP | | http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2004/tc20041123_3012_tc184.htm Interesting comments. Of course, people have been predicting this for a decade, and so far it's always going to happen Real Soon Now. An interesting case study is ComedyCentral.com, whose Daily Show got lots of attention before the recent election as being one of the best places to get good political news. But their web site is hardly usable. Part of this is a strong MS bias, but even people running IE on Windows report that their online video clips "just don't work". They used to work on our Mac, but stopped working there a few months back. Funny thing is that lots of political blogs mirror many of the ComedyCentral videos, and they almost always work when you get them from the blogs' links. What seems to be going on is that ComedyCentral doesn't give you links to their videos. They want to embed them in pages with ads, so their links download an HTML page that's mostly javascript. The JS attempts to download the video clips and display them inside the page, between ads. And this usually fails in various ways. Most often, it tells you that you don't have the required plugin. If you believe this and reinstall, it again tells you that you don't have the plugin. Other times, it decides that the plugin is present, but no video appears, just a background-colored rectangle (sometimes with audio). An more curious semi-failure happens on our Mac: With some of their video clips, you get a popup telling you that it can't display the video, but Windows Media Player might be able to. When you click on the go-ahead button, WMP opens and plays the video. (Of course, it's really crappy video, with lots of pauses, loss of sync between picture and voice, and all the other problems that WMP has, but at least it sorta plays.) I've done a bit of experimenting with trying to deliver content like this, and I have a lot of sympathy for the techies at ComedyCentral who are trying to do the job the way their management wants. The documentation for plugins is crap; there are a zillion versions of browsers and plugins out there that all work differently; there's no way to debug for all the combinations that customers have; and on and on with all the ways you can do software wrong. Anyway, from what I've seen, doing TV over IP is still pretty far from ready for prime time. Unless the suppliers are willing to just show you a list of simple hyperlinks that just download the file and hand it over to a helper app, that is. That works pretty well. But the Big Guys aren't likely to go for something so simple (and that doesn't use something proprietary to keep out the competitors ;-). The only way I can see it being commercially viable given the current mess is to put together a TVoIP "appliance" that packages everything and has no "computer" that's visible to a user. Even then, you'd have a major debugging effort to make it work for what's out there. Or you could just not allow access to web sites, and force customers to get shows only from your own server. That's probably what will be done, using IP only as a transport, but not permitting any access except to a single server. Limited as this might be, it would still be an interesting advance. Such an appliance could work from anywhere on the Internet. So it could end the local monopoly of the cable company. Cable companies might slowly become just ISPs. They'd be (regulated) monopolies in most places, but they'd just supply the pipe and would have no control over content.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |