![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> > - I have DSL, not cable. It's my understanding that I can't drop my > > current POTS phone line, because then my DSL won't work. > Usually true. Speakeasy offers "naked DSL", which will work without > having POTS; it costs a few dollars a month more than the usual sort. > SDSL service (generally much more expensive and bought by businesses) > doesn't coexist with POTS at all. In Mass, last I heard it was not lawful to replace the only POTS line in a residense with ain ISDN digital service due to ned for E911 sevice w/o power. I would expect but do not know that this also applies to naked DSL as the only line *in a residense*. The trend of folks disconnecting their POTS and just using their cellphone is scary from an emergency point of view. And no, GPS phone doesnt help much. Cheer, bill