Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Sorry in my late response. On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > > > > My additional techie requirements are: > > * Cheap > > What is "cheap?" Where I don't have to double their DSL costs because I need SDSL + Static IPs, along with buying a new server. > > * Secure > How secure? Usual fare, non plaintext passwords, preferably something thats encrypted a la SSH. > > * Easy to maintain (I am the closest thing they have their to a geek) > How geeky are you? Quite Geeky, (Able to leap moderately high buildings with a running start and favorable winds) but also bear in mind I don't think they want to call me in every week to look at something that's gone wrong. They'd prefer soemthing that just works. > Actually, I have a similar sort of thing working. I have a el-cheapo > Netgear VPN router. For users with similar routers, it is basicaly adding > some IP numbers. I hadn't thought of that. *scribble* > The one problem I see in all this is "disk access." Apps don't take kindly > to hard disks going away as is likely to happen over the internet. Indeed, I won't have them directly access it via SMB for exactly the reasons stated (BTDTGTTS), but I have no problem with them using FTP as long as they are encapsulated some way. Thanks! ~Ben -- /"\ Ben Jackson \ / bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/ X Member of the ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML Mail / \
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |