| Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:46:51PM -0500, Gregory Boyce wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Bill Holt wrote:
>
> >woops...
> >find . -name '*' | xargs rm
>
> Wouldn't this end up adding all of the filenames as an argument to rm,
> hitting the same argument limitation that "rm *" would get?
xargs breaks up the command into multiple commands to keep line length
under control - that's its whole purpose for being. The alternative:
rm `find . -name '*'`
would do exactly what you describe.
Nathan
>
> I would normally do:
>
> find . -name '*' -exec rm {} \;
>
> It ends up invoking a separate rm for each file which gets around that
> problem, although it'll probably be slower since it needs to spawn a new
> process each time.
>
> --
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>