Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jerry Feldman wrote: | On Tuesday 01 February 2005 08:18, Gordon Marx wrote: | > It's what I do at work, because they expect me to work with Vim | > 5.something and no LaTeX, which I couldn't handle. | Agreed. Sometimes I think IT people expect programmers to work using ed. Heh. I've occasionally been glad that in my early days of working on unix, I got very familiar with using ed and sed. I've been faced with enough machines where fancier editors couldn't be used sanely, and to get the system out of trouble, I had to use ed to fix up some damaged files. Not that I'd want to do that for normal work. I've also written quite a few scripts that invoke ed or sed. Not so many in recent years, though. When the idea comes up, I usually ask myself if it's time to insert a few dollars and semicolons, and convert the script to perl. The answer is almost always "Yes." Then the editing can be done in the script without a subprocess, and with a more powerful editing language. But I still have a number of scripts with code like: ed $file <<EOF ... w q EOF
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |