Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:09:48 -0500 (EST) David Backeberg <dave at math.mit.edu> wrote: >> Both editors support copy and paste, special color highlighting (vim or >> emacs run within X), and other nice features for "power users". Emacs also >> has "buffer modes", which affect the way syntax highlighting behaves, for >> instance, there are special color modes for editing C++ or html files. >> One of the things I do frequently in emacs is to use ediff. This is a diff mode that allows you to compare 2 or more files. Each difference is color highlighted, and you can perform various operations. > BTW: Vi also has multiple buffers, so you can copy something into a buffer, load another file, and paste, but I think that emacs is a bit easier here. > Another emacs feature is keyboard macros. You can record a keyboard macro, name it and save it. Truly, it is vim that has all the features, and not vi. Vim means vi improved. There are multiple buffers and windows, syntax highlighting (you can write your own syntax highlighting as well), remote file tranfers, and macros: (recording, assigning, etc.). I'm sure vim was brought about becuase vi users didn't want to switch to emacs, and just wrote add-ons to vi. With the block visual mode in vim, you can select columns or blocks of text as well: very handy for cutting out line numbers from pasted text. -- Chadwick
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |