Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2005 1:45 pm, Kent Borg wrote: > > That does bring up another reason for encrypting data: To maybe make > > it possible to do warranty returns on dead disks that were used to > > store sensitive data. > There should be a certain amount of trust involved. A vendor _SHOULD_ either > destroy the platters or bulk erase them. I would doubt that a vendor would > take the time to extract the data as data recovery is labor intensive. A *vendor* might not, bit an *employee of that vendor* might. It may not be his job, and it may even be specifically prohibited, but that doesn't mean someone won't be sufficiently bored and skilled. And the original case was talking about a data recovery house, not a hard drive return. If I were returning a hard drive that I had sensitive data on it, I would certainly degauss it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DDDD David Kramer david at thekramers.net http://thekramers.net DK KD "We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff DKK D that works. How do you recognize something that is still technology? DK KD A good clue is if it comes with a manual." DDDD - Douglas Adams, in The Salmon of Doubt. (Harmony Books, 2002.)
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |