Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:06:53 -0400 Bill Horne <bill at horne.net> wrote: > I think the most important factor is the receiver design, and I prefer > to have the same manufacturer at both ends of the link. Cisco is by far > the best, but priced for commercial use; Linksys is now part of Cisco, > but I don't know if they're sharing patents yet. > > BTW, there are devices available which will allow use of Cable-TV Coax > for wired Ethernet connections: many apartment buildings were built with > Cable but without Cat 5, so if he's got some spare RG-59 in the walls, > have him call me. He's got cable in two rooms, but I don't think he will have a problem. I might just grab my wireless and test the range since I have old equipment. In a standard wireless-B router will handle it, then I'll get him a -G. BTW: He lives across the street from a Verizon CO. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20050613/7f7be4de/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |